464 723 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES Dec. 3, 2009, p. 56, ln. 8–10). Carmelo would also often play board games and cards with his children, dominos, checkers and ‘‘brisca’’ (a Spanish card game), and would joke with Eladia when she played along, prompting one of her sisters to playfully ask ‘‘Hey Dad, why are you winking at Mom?’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 56, ln. 12–23). Whenever a new baby was born to the family, Carmelo would lovingly take the older children (Luz, Ruth, Luis and Gloria) aside right after the new baby was born— family babies were always born at home with a midwife rather than in the hospital—and put the newborn into each of their arms and say ‘‘This is your new sister or brother. You have to love [her/ ]him very much and take care of [her/ ]him.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 55, ln. 1–15). Luz testified that Carmelo’s life’s dream was to travel to the Holy Land. She said, ‘‘He [Carmelo] would always tell us that before he died he wanted to see the land that Jesus walked. And he never got an opportunity to see it because that [the Lod Airport Attack] happened at the airport [Lod Airport].’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 58, ln. 21–25) When Luz learned of her father’s murder, she ‘‘couldn’t believe it,’’ because she had recently seen her father and he was ‘‘the healthiest my father had been. He even had gained some weight. He even looked younger.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 60, ln. 2–5) When asked at trial how she felt after looking at photographs of the massacre at trial, she commented ‘‘it affected me because I didn’t want to see those scenes again. I—just that I always wanted to remember him [Carmelo] like he was when he was with us.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 65, ln. 20–24) As an American citizen, Luz has a direct cause of action under section 1605A. She has suffered in many ways from the attack. Her family life has been permanently disrupted and her childhood and past relationship with her mother and siblings has been marred. Luz is therefore entitled to the following award for each of the following claims set forth in plaintiffs’ Complaint: 1. first claim for relief (for damages under 28 U.S.C. § 1605A(c)); namely, that defendants provided material support and resources which caused and facilitated the Lod Airport Attack; 2. fourth claim for relief; namely, that defendants’ behavior (a) was intended to and did in fact terrorize Luz and cause her severe emotional distress, and (b) was willful, outrageous, egregious, and dangerous to human life, and violated applicable criminal law, all international standards of civilized human conduct and common decency, and (c) was outrageous in the extreme, wanton, willful and malicious, and constituted a threat to the public at large, warranting an award of punitive damages; 3. fifth claim for relief; namely, (a) that the murder of Carmelo by the JRA caused Luz to be deprived of the services, society and solatium of her deceased father, and to suffer severe mental anguish, bereavement and grief, and injury to her feelings, and (b) that defendants’ conduct as specified here was outrageous in the extreme, wanton, willful and malicious, and constituted a threat to the public at large, and therefore Luz is entitled to an award of punitive damages against defendants; 4. eighth claim for relief; namely, that defendants knowingly and willingly conspired, planned and agreed to sponsor and provide material support and resources for the commission of acts of extrajudicial killing by terrorist organizations, including the attack at the airport in which Carmelo was killed, and as a result and by reason of the death of Carmelo, which was caused by