CALDERON–CARDONA v. DEM. PEOPLE’S REP. OF KOREA Cite as 723 F.Supp.2d 441 (D.Puerto Rico 2010) and therefore Jose is entitled to an award of punitive damages against defendants; 4. eighth claim for relief; namely, that defendants knowingly and willingly conspired, planned and agreed to sponsor and provide material support and resources for the commission of acts of extrajudicial killing by terrorist organizations, including the attack at the airport in which Carmelo was killed, and as a result and by reason of the death of Carmelo, which was caused by defendants’ conspiracy described here, Jose suffered the damages enumerated here; and 5. ninth claim for relief; namely, that defendants knowingly and willingly carried out tortious acts in concert with others pursuant to a common design, which resulted in extrajudicial killings by terrorist organizations, including the Lod Airport Attack at the airport in which Carmelo was killed and, as a result and by reason of the death of Carmelo, which was caused by defendants’ aiding and abetting described here, Jose suffered the damages enumerated here. The analysis detailed above regarding awards to direct terror victims and relatives of victims is applicable to Jose as well. Like the rest of his family, Jose has been harmed on many levels by the Lod Airport Attack. He lost a loving and devoted father, witnessed his mother become permanently depressed and disabled, suffers the trauma of the JRA’s murder of his father, and endures the daily disruption to his family life and his relationship with his parents and siblings. Accordingly, Jose is awarded $5,000,000 as compensatory damages. Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the full amount of Jose’s compensatory damages. F. Ana Delia Calderon–Cardona Ana Calderon–Cardona (‘‘Ana’’) is a citizen of the United States (Exhibit No. 30) and resides in Puerto Rico. From the time 471 of her father’s death, Ana has experienced emotional pain and suffering, loss of her father’s society, companionship, comfort, advice and counsel and has suffered severe mental anguish and extreme emotional distress. Ana testified at trial that growing up in Carmelo’s home was ‘‘very good’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 33, ln. 21.) She remembers fondly how Carmelo would sit with her and her siblings on the porch and teach them poems, sing theme songs (mainly hymns) and tell all kinds of stories, stories about when he was a boy. (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 34, ln. 6–16) She referred to Carmelo as ‘‘the best [father] in the world’’ because ‘‘he was a friend, he was an advisor, he was a good father, a good provider, he would take care of his children.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, pp. 34–35) Ana also stated that Carmelo would spoil them: ‘‘Well, he [Carmelo] would buy us everything—well, he would give our mother money for her to buy us things. If he saw something that he liked, he would bring it to the children, the younger children, and always take us out.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 35, ln. 4–7) Upon learning of her father’s murder, Ana immediately went to her mother’s home. She felt like she was ‘‘walking on air.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 39, ln. 7) When she broke the news of her Carmelo’s murder to her fifteen year old son, he replied that he wanted to go where [the terrorists] were and ‘‘pay them back.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 39, ln. 11–16) Ana stated that after Carmelo’s death her mother, Eladia, ‘‘was almost always under sedation because she had a heart condition and her blood pressure shot up during those days, so the doctor was almost always going to see her, if not every day.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p.

Select target paragraph3