470 723 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES and resides in Puerto Rico. From the time of his father’s death, Jose experienced emotional pain and suffering, loss of his father’s society, companionship, comfort, advice and counsel and has suffered severe mental anguish and extreme emotional distress. Jose testified at trial that Carmelo was ‘‘a very loving father’’ with whom he had a ‘‘very good’’ relationship. (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 69, ln. 13, 21) Jose stated that Carmelo would spend time with him and his siblings teaching them about his profession, and they would sometimes go to work with him. (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 69, ln. 13–16) Once Jose was married, he would even see his parents every Saturday, when the entire family would converge on their childhood home. The family would also all get together on every holiday. (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 70, ln. 4–10) Jose testified at trial that when he heard that his father had been murdered, he felt as if his ‘‘world [had] ended’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 71, ln. 23) and went straight to his parents’ house to see his mother. (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 72, ln. 6) He wore dark glasses at Carmelo’s funeral because he didn’t want anybody to see that he was crying. (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 73, ln. 1–5) Jose said that the first Christmas after his father was murdered was a very sad occasion, and that ‘‘[i]t wasn’t the same. We were missing the cornerstone of our family [Carmelo].’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, pp. 73–74) Jose said that he thinks of his father in particular on the anniversary of his murder and on all of the holidays when the family used to converge on their parents’ home. (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 74, ln. 17–20) Jose said that he feels ‘‘very sorry’’ that his child never had a chance to meet his grandfather, Carmelo. (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 74, ln. 24–25) When asked about how he felt when viewing pictures of the Lod Airport Attack during the trial, Jose testified ‘‘I felt immense pain within me because I was thinking of what was—what went through his mind? What was happening? If he saw the bullets? If he died quickly? If it took him time to die? You know.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 75, ln. 2–9) As an American citizen, Jose has a direct cause of action under section 1605A. He has suffered in many ways from the attack. His family life has been permanently disrupted and his childhood and past relationship with his parents and siblings has been marred. Jose is therefore entitled to the following award for the following claims enumerated in plaintiffs’ Complaint: 1. first claim for relief (for damages under 28 U.S.C. § 1605A(c)); namely, that defendants provided material support and resources which caused and facilitated the Lod Airport Attack; 2. fourth claim for relief; namely, that defendants’ behavior (a) was intended to and did in fact terrorize Jose and cause him severe emotional distress, (b) was willful, outrageous, egregious, and dangerous to human life, and violated applicable criminal law, all international standards of civilized human conduct and common decency, and (c) was outrageous in the extreme, wanton, willful and malicious, and constituted a threat to the public at large, warranting an award of punitive damages; 3. fifth claim for relief; namely, (a) that the murder of Carmelo by the JRA caused Jose to be deprived of the services, society and solatium of his deceased father, and to suffer severe mental anguish, bereavement and grief, and injury to his feelings, and (b) that defendants’ conduct as specified here was outrageous in the extreme, wanton, willful and malicious, and constituted a threat to the public at large,