476 723 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES 4. eighth claim for relief; namely, that defendants knowingly and willingly conspired, planned and agreed to sponsor and provide material support and resources for the commission of acts of extrajudicial killing by terrorist organizations, including the attack at the airport in which Carmelo was killed, and as a result and by reason of the death of Carmelo, which was caused by defendants’ conspiracy described here, Salvador suffered the damages enumerated here; and 5. ninth claim for relief; namely, that defendants knowingly and willingly carried out tortious acts in concert with others pursuant to a common design, which resulted in extrajudicial killings by terrorist organizations, including the Lod Airport Attack at the airport in which Carmelo was killed and, as a result and by reason of the death of Carmelo, which was caused by defendants’ aiding and abetting described here, Salvador suffered the damages enumerated here. The analysis detailed above regarding awards to direct terror victims and relatives of victims is applicable to Salvador. Like the rest of his family, Salvador has been harmed on many levels by the Lod Airport Attack. He lost a loving and devoted father, suffers the trauma of the JRA’s murder of his father, and endures the daily disruption to his family life and his relationship with his parents, siblings and half-siblings. Accordingly, Salvador is awarded $5,000,000 as compensatory damages. Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the full amount of Salvador’s compensatory damages. I. The Estates of Carmelo Calderon– Molina and Eladia Cardona–Rosario Although Carmelo’s estate is named as a plaintiff in this action, it appears that he did not experience any conscious pain before dying. Nor did Carmelo, who was retired at the time of his murder, suffer a loss of future income. Accordingly, plaintiffs have not sought an award of damages for Carmelo’s estate. By contrast, Carmelo’s murder caused his wife, Eladia severe compensable harm. The relationship between Carmelo and Eladia was ‘‘[v]ery good.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 11, ln. 7–9). Carmelo and Eladia had a loving marriage. (Declaration of Luis Calderon–Cardona, Exhibit No. 26, at ¶ 6.) The news of Carmelo’s death caused Eladia such severe anguish that she had to be continuously and heavily sedated for approximately a week after the murder as well as during the funeral, out of concern that, due to the condition of her heart and blood pressure, her life was in danger. (Id. at p. 24, ln. 17–25; p. 38, ln. 24–p. 39, ln. 5; p. 40, ln. 3–10; p. 46 ln. 24–p. 47, ln. 3; p. 49, ln. 1– 5; p. 60, ln. 20–p. 61. ln. 1; Declaration of Ruth Calderon–Cardona, Exhibit No. 27, at ¶ 17; Declaration of Luz Calderon–Cardona, Exhibit No. 28, at ¶¶ 7–8) The loss of her husband was ‘‘monumental’’ (Exhibit No. 28 at ¶ 13) and affected Eladia ‘‘tremendously’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009 at p. 29, ln. 13–17), and she was continuously sad for an extended period after the murder, particularly whenever Carmelo would be mentioned. (Id. at p. 50, ln. 8– 18). Eladia suffered particularly at night, and experienced frequent nightmares in which Carmelo appeared to her. (Exhibit No. 28 at ¶ 13) After the murder, Eladia became heavily dependant on her children. (Exhibit No. 27 at ¶ 26; Exhibit No. 28 at ¶ 12) [6] As an American citizen, Eladia’s estate has a direct cause of action under section 1605A. Eladia’s estate is therefore entitled to the following award for each of the following claims enumerated in plaintiffs’ Complaint: 1. first claim for relief (for damages under 28 U.S.C. § 1605A(c)); namely, that