472 723 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES 40, ln. 6–9). When Ana saw her father’s body at his funeral, all she was able to do was ‘‘cry, cry, and cry and cry.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 40, ln. 21) Ana does not feel, 37 years after Carmelo’s murder, that she has been able to overcome his loss. As she testified, ‘‘[i]t’s too strong a pain TTT But [it’s] strong. It’s always strong.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 41, ln. 19–22) When asked at trial whether there was anything more she wanted to tell the Court about her loss, Ana said, ‘‘May God forgive the ones who did this. And—Well, and I wouldn’t want anybody, anybody in the world to suffer or to go through what we went—what his daughters had to go through.’’ (Trial Transcript, Dec. 3, 2009, p. 42, ln. 8–10) As an American citizen, Ana has a direct cause of action under section 1605A. She has suffered in many ways from the attack. Her family life has been permanently disrupted and her childhood and past relationship with her parents and siblings has been marred. Ana is therefore entitled to the following award for each of the following claims enumerated in plaintiffs’ Complaint: 1. first claim for relief (for damages under 28 U.S.C. § 1605A(c)); namely, that defendants provided material support and resources which caused and facilitated the Lod Airport Attack; 2. fourth claim for relief; namely, that defendants’ behavior (a) was intended to and did in fact terrorize Ana and cause her severe emotional distress, (b) was willful, outrageous, egregious, and dangerous to human life, and violated applicable criminal law, all international standards of civilized human conduct and common decency, and (c) was outrageous in the extreme, wanton, willful and malicious, and constituted a threat to the public at large, warranting an award of punitive damages; 3. fifth claim for relief; namely, (a) that the murder of Carmelo by the JRA caused Ana to be deprived of the services, society and solatium of her deceased father, and to suffer severe mental anguish, bereavement and grief, and injury to her feelings, and (b) that defendants’ conduct as specified here was outrageous in the extreme, wanton, willful and malicious, and constituted a threat to the public at large, and therefore Ana is entitled to an award of punitive damages against defendants; 4. eighth claim for relief; namely, that defendants knowingly and willingly conspired, planned and agreed to sponsor and provide material support and resources for the commission of acts of extrajudicial killing by terrorist organizations, including the attack at the airport in which Carmelo was killed, and as a result and by reason of the death of Carmelo, which was caused by defendants’ conspiracy described here, Ana suffered the damages enumerated here; and 5. ninth claim for relief; namely, that defendants knowingly and willingly carried out tortious acts in concert with others pursuant to a common design, which resulted in extrajudicial killings by terrorist organizations, including the Lod Airport Attack at the airport in which Carmelo was killed and, as a result and by reason of the death of Carmelo, which was caused by defendants’ aiding and abetting described here, Ana suffered the damages enumerated here. The analysis detailed above regarding awards to direct terror victims and relatives of victims is applicable to Ana. Like the rest of her family, Ana has been harmed on many levels by the Lod Airport Attack. She lost a loving and devoted father, witnessed her mother become permanently depressed and disabled, suffers the trauma of the JRA’s murder of her father, and endures the daily disruption to